These dimensions determine the organizational culture of an organization. For instance, in high power distant societies, the traditions and norms adopted will entail little interaction between management and employees. As such, the nature of organizational culture is that it is also subject to cultural factors such as diversity and variations thereof. This is because properties such as power distance, uncertainty avoidant, individualism, and masculinity vary across cultures and continents, meaning that organizational culture also has a cultural aspect or is subject to cultural aspects.
They apply for visas and travel to these countries especially in the United States of America so that they may look for green pastures,. That is what they do. Some turn out to be allowing it to be in daily life whenever for some reality be more complicated since they will find on their own beneath the bars brought about by engagement in unlawful behavior they will might probably would rather have in an attempt to endure. One another massive obstacle they can are up against is racism.
Holbeche (2006) also notes that in as much as strategic innovation along with product improvement and flexibility are central in an organization’s working processes; these can only be achieved if the employees are willing to put in the necessary hard work, which is facilitated by a good organizational culture. So arguably, the organizational culture greatly affects innovation within the organization setting based on this theory of its significance to strategic planning or management. Below is a critical review of the theories of the nature of organizational culture, which will also include an analysis of how this may affect innovation within an organization, and in which ways the leaders of an organization can effectively manage it.
Various theories have been presented all seeking to illuminate the nature of organizational culture. A study of the works of Maanen and Schein (1977) for instance argue that the here and now behaviors adopted by members of an organization are associated with various attributed related to the organization or groups, but only certain patterns re passed from one group of organizational members to another.
Apart from men and animals, a lot is affected as is the case with forests most of which has so far been depleted. Without adequate forest cover, the amount of rainfall recorded isn’t able to avail much as expected. It only forces man to consider other means and ways aimed at ensuring water security. Some are encouraged to consider educating the society on the dangers posed by such a state thus needs to change their approach to life. This is achievable through a social centered kind of initiatives such as tree planting so as to replenish the once rich diversity as initiated by Mother Nature (Houghton 7).
Apart from the wellbeing of men; wild animals have also been affected by human encroachment on their habitat. This likely to make many wild animals shift from their habitat. In order to survive, some could even change their migration patterns. Part of the reason why this comes about is because their migration patterns have been encroached by uncontrolled human settlement. In future it might be hard for most countries to maintain such treasures as seen by there being a decrease in the number of wild animals than it was in the past. Some may as well be affected by toxin which could on the other hand be disposed in the open only poisoning the animal habitat. This ought to be discouraged to safeguard the gains made.
According to Rose et al(2008) organizational culture is viewed as a means through which the problems experienced by workers can be brought to light, an principles are set, as are the expectations and behavior patterns and traditions that facilitate increased achievement. In this regard, organizational culture is seen as a tool to enhance achievement, and a means for the discovery of various human issues such as employee problems. Alternatively, Shahzad et al. (2012) argue that organizational culture can be conceptualized using two main approaches; the process oriented approach, and the classification approach. The process oriented approach assumes that organizational culture is a permanent response to certain problems (Shahzad et al, 2012). In this approach, organizational culture is perceived as an outline of hypothesis invented concerning a specific problem, and after testing is considered suitable (Shahzad et al., 2012). Three levels of culture are discussed in this approach, and these are behaviors which constitute the social and physical environment, values which entail the underlying meaning used to interpret the outline, and basic assumptions or norms which entail those behaviors which are difficult to learn or change (Shahzad et al., 2012).
It is in a context of these challenges that both health professionals and all persons involved in these situations require ethical criteria to guide towards authentic humanization of the terminal phase of life.
The moral obligation to ensure the special protection human life is witnessed in primary precepts of humanity, with various expressions across cultures, and encoded in the biblical commandment of the Decalogue: "Thou shalt not kill" (Deut. 5:17). Compliance with this requirement is certainly incompatible with any form of direct assault on human life, where it does not threaten the existence of other people.
Consequently, it is ethically unacceptable any form of euthanasia, any act or omission which, by its nature and the intention causes death. Even the goal of eliminating suffering and rid the person of a painful state can legitimize euthanasia, the more that medicine and society have other means to help the terminally ill patients (Ten & Welie, (2014, p. 123-136). Equivalent to euthanasia, the ethical point of view, is any form of assisted suicide, also called assisted suicide.
On the contrary, rich countries are known to exploit the less developed countries most of which are now adversely affected by this menace. This implies that they are unable to produce as much as they may desire yet the population keeps growing so fast. It only causes them to keep on depending on aid to make ends meet. The poverty index has thus escalated over time as pressure is now exerted on the few available resources. Conflicts have also arisen as most people as well as nations fight over the remaining resource (Meinshausen 1158). This has led to instability among states. It also explains why rich nations exploit others but is largely due to their selfish intent. Development may not at times be prioritized as resource is on the other hand be used in meaningless activities such as ammunition.
Jungles are destroyed in an worrying price. Immense variety of shrubs have been reduce to make timber to makefirewood and furniture, charcoal eliminating so to remove the terrain for farming at the same time ranching.